{ Abstract } | { page one } | { page two } | { page three } | { page four } |
In this experiment, we observed the parent peak (calcd 347.02, obsd 347.33) in cation detection mode. No fragmentation was observed -- the two lower mass peaks are from the ATT matrix and its dimer. |
The experiment was repeated without any matrix. Since cyclopentadienyl rhenium complexes absorb light over a wide range of energy, it seemed reasonable that they could be ejected from the surface in the same way that standard matrices are. The laser power required to see signal was slightly higher without the ATT matrix, but the result (right spectrum above) cleanly showed the parent ion only. |
The ATT-matrix spectrum showed the parent ion (calcd 361.04, obsd 361.35) in cation detection mode, plus the signals from the ATT matrix and its dimer. |
Again, the experiment was repeated without any matrix. As with the unsubstituted allyl complex, the parent ion (right spectrum above) was cleanly observed. |
Cp*Re(CO)2(h3-tBu-C C-CH2)+ is a pi-propargyl complex . |
|||||
With ATT matrix ...click to see spectrum full-size... |
Cyclopentadienyl rhenium dicarbonyl (h3-tBu-C
C-CH2) cation. |
No matrix ...click to see spectrum full-size... |
Pi-propargyl complexes are more reactive than pi-allyl complexes, and it was difficult for us to observe the parent ions of these complexes using LSIMS, where reaction with water or the liquid matrix rapidly decomposed the analyte. Using solid ATT as a matrix, we were able to observe the parent ion (calcd 471.15, obsd 471.43). |
Ideally, we would likt to remove all possiblity of reaction with the matrix by not using any. As was the case with the allyl complexes, the parent ion (right spectrum above) was cleanly observed. |
------page two------ | ------page four----- |
{ Abstract } | { page one } | { page two } | { page three } | { page four } |