The promise of epibatidine as an
analgesic began with the very first hotplate and tail-twitching
pain experiments on mice. The spectroscopic data showed
the similarity between the structures of epibatidine
and nicotine with both sharing the pyridyl ring. This
similarity was what first suggested nicotinic receptors
as a mode of action of the toxin. Investigations with
mice have since shown that epibatidineis not only selective
for nicotinic receptors in the brain, but for neuromuscular
nicotinic receptors as well.
The nicotinic receptors in the brain
are involved in pain suppression and provide very strong
analgesia, but with none of the side effects of morphine.
Mice given doses of morphine, then taught to press a
switch to administer more does will continue to press
the switch with increasing frequency, even when there
was no source of pain. When this experiement was repeated
with epibatidine, the mice showed no sign of either
addiction or tolerance and did not press the switch
when in no pain.
However, epibatidine also bound very
strongly to the neuromuscular receptor in which acetylcholine
regulates muscle contraction and relaxation. By binding
to these, epibatidine causes paralysis, and can kill
if the muscles of the lungs and respiratory system become
depressed.
Chemically, epibatidine would bind
more effectively to the receptor as the NH on the bicyclic
ring would provide better hydrogen bonding, therefore
more intermolecular forces of attraction to the protein.
This side effect means epibatidine
is useless itself as an analgesic, but by producing
an epibatidine derivative which would be selective only
for the nicotinic receptors in the brain, and not those
at the neuromuscular junction, a new class of painkiller
would be released. Current research into derivatives
continues.
|