> Olivo Miotto wrote:
>
> > 2) I can understand that compatibility with RDF is a noble target,
> > but I think the interchangeability of Elements and Attributes (DCD
> > section 2.1.2) clouds the water, making it more difficult to process
> > DCD files. I would rather the syntax="explicit" form be the only way
> > of specifying DCD. The remainder of my questions assume this
> > form.
>
> I agree.
As do I -- the interchangeability of attributes and elements is an
unnecessarilty icky part of DCD, whatever the excuse.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/