Re: C++ or IDL definitions for SAX

Tyler Baker (david@megginson.com)
Tue, 13 Oct 1998 16:43:20 -0400 (EDT)


Tyler Baker writes:

> I am not so sure a CORBA IDL definition of SAX would be so useful
> anyways unless you developed some efficient method of multiplexing
> the SAX events that get sent over the network.

It seems like a fairly simple thing to manage, because the
dependencies are mostly one-way -- the driver could deliver events in
chunks of 100 (or 1,000, or whatever), blocking only when it needs
user input from an EntityResolver.

> As far as C++ goes, I don't think a lot of people are doing too
> much work here because any popular C++ tools for Windows have
> pretty much no chance anymore of making an impact because of a very
> well known large company having the reputation of cloning anything
> and everything of any value written in C++ (looks like Java and a
> few other lesser known languages are the last bastion of hope for
> the software industry).

That might be an extreme position. MS certainly has reduced
techno-diversity in commercial software, but it hasn't been able to do
much damage to free software (which is where most XML parsers live):
for example, Apache and Perl still own their markets.

All the best,

David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/