Yes, I think so. The "checked for validity" that 3.3.3. discusses is
"checked for conformance to its DTD." 3.3.3. could be more explicit. (the
W3C doesn't really seem to have a mechanism for minor patches to its
specs...does it?)
Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco
It's such a
Bore
Being always
Poor
LANGSTON HUGHES
http://www.northshore.net/homepages/hope/engHughes.html